<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay Yourself Second, Pay Your Debts First</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.personalfinanceanalyst.com/pay-yourself-second-pay-your-debts-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.personalfinanceanalyst.com/pay-yourself-second-pay-your-debts-first/</link>
	<description>A Personal Finance Blog dedicated to taking the mystery out of money and helping you to live a happier, more successful life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeannie</title>
		<link>http://www.personalfinanceanalyst.com/pay-yourself-second-pay-your-debts-first/comment-page-1/#comment-6318</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalfinanceanalyst.com/?p=1513#comment-6318</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am a huge advocate of maxing out 401K matching contributions.  It’s like someone giving you money… with no strings attached.  In spite of of how the stock market is performing… you make a guaranteed 25… 50… 100 percent return for just signing up.&quot;

No strings attached? How in the world do you make that assumption? The SPD for most 401k plans is pages and pages of strings. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m a fan of 401ks, but to state there are no strings attached is irresponsible, as you can&#039;t possible speak for every employer plan out there.

You make a guaranteed return? Again, your proof is what?!? My account is actually worth *less* at the moment than the total of the contributions I&#039;ve made to it. Even if you factor in the tax savings on that income (of course, it&#039;s not savings, it&#039;s deferred taxes) I&#039;m still losing money! Yes I know it will turn at some point, which is why I&#039;m still a fan of them in general, but you&#039;re making some crazily broad statements here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am a huge advocate of maxing out 401K matching contributions.  It’s like someone giving you money… with no strings attached.  In spite of of how the stock market is performing… you make a guaranteed 25… 50… 100 percent return for just signing up.&#8221;</p>
<p>No strings attached? How in the world do you make that assumption? The SPD for most 401k plans is pages and pages of strings. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m a fan of 401ks, but to state there are no strings attached is irresponsible, as you can&#8217;t possible speak for every employer plan out there.</p>
<p>You make a guaranteed return? Again, your proof is what?!? My account is actually worth *less* at the moment than the total of the contributions I&#8217;ve made to it. Even if you factor in the tax savings on that income (of course, it&#8217;s not savings, it&#8217;s deferred taxes) I&#8217;m still losing money! Yes I know it will turn at some point, which is why I&#8217;m still a fan of them in general, but you&#8217;re making some crazily broad statements here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

